Is affirmative action necessary

Blog Affirmative Action Affirmative Action began as a plan to equalize the educational, employment, and contracting opportunities for minorities and women with opportunities given to their white, male counterparts. Such race-conscious Affirmative Action programs have been the source of much controversy and sometimes violent protests. Race-conscious affirmative action programs are subject to review under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act ofif practiced by private or public employers and unions, Title VI if practiced by state or private recipients of federal funds, and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, if practiced by governmental agencies.

Is affirmative action necessary

Most people recognize that to be economically competitive and socially just, America needs to draw upon the talents of students from all backgrounds. Moreover, the education of all students is enriched when they can learn from classmates who have different sets of life experiences.

At the same time, however, many Americans—including several members of the U.

Is affirmative action necessary

Supreme Court—are uneasy with explicitly using race as a factor in college admissions. No one likes to be told what to do, and in the case of college admissions, university officials are right to guard their academic freedoms strenuously.

Sign up for updates. Many legal experts suggest that now is the time for universities to begin seriously thinking about how to promote racial, ethnic, and economic diversity in new ways. This volume is an outgrowth of that gathering.

In their chapters, the authors tackle the critical questions: What is the future of affirmative action given the requirements of the Fisher court?

What can be learned from the experiences of states that created race-neutral strategies in response to voter initiatives and other actions banning consideration of race at public universities?

Affirmative Action Overview

What does research by higher education scholars suggest are the most promising new strategies to promoting diversity in a manner that the courts will support?

How do public policies need to change in order to tap into the talents of all students in a new legal and political environment? To date, many universities have achieved racial and ethnic diversity by recruiting fairly well off students of color. According to William G. In that sense, might Fisher represent not only a new challenge to the use of racial criteria but also a new opportunity to tackle, at long last, burgeoning economic divisions in society?

Can new approaches be created that honor racial, ethnic, and economic diversity in one fell swoop? This volume proceeds in five parts. The Stakes Part I addresses the stakes involved in diversity discussions. Why do racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity matter in higher education?

Why are universities right not to simply select the students with the highest grades and test scores irrespective of diversity? Why, indeed, should we care at all about who attends selective colleges in the first place?

Is affirmative action necessary

In Chapter 2, Nancy Cantor, the president of Rutgers Newark and the former chancellor of Syracuse University, explains with her colleague Peter Englot that racial, ethnic, and economic diversity on campus is vital. The twin trends of increasing economic inequality and the racial and ethnic shift in the population mean that America can no longer afford to bypass its growing number of low-income and minority students.

The toddler population is already majority minority in fourteen states, including California, New York, Texas, and Florida, they write. Not only does having students from a variety of economic backgrounds enhance the learning and discussions on campus, it also might make college more affordable for everyone, she argues.

Selective colleges are economically segregated in part because they are so expensive. Download But the converse may also be true:Drop The Charges Against the Anti-Trump Berkeley 5! Defend Bay Area Defenders of Democracy Drop the Charge Against the Berkeley 5 Anti-Fascist Protesters Defend Taylor Fuller, Scott Hedrick, Nathan Perry, Jeff Armstrong, Dustin Sawtelle (from left to right).

The Future of Affirmative Action New Paths to Higher Education Diversity after Fisher v. University of Texas June 19, — Richard D.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

Kahlenberg. Return to FAA/Educators: Affirmative Action and Financial Aid.

{dialog-heading}

Affirmative action is often defined as the effort to improve access to higher education for . Affirmative Action Timeline [ Complete Timeline March 6, Executive Order makes the first mention of "affirmative action" July 2, Civil Rights Act signed by President Lyndon Johnson. "Advocates of affirmative action contend that these programs are necessary to help overcome decades of discrimination against minority citizens and women.".

The Justice Department apparently wants to revisit the perennial issue of affirmative action in university and college admissions — remarkable news for many reasons, not the least of which is.

Affirmative Action | Overview