Who is involved in the security system development life cycle who leads this process

It could be the delivery of products or services to end-users, or the performance of support services to ensure customer satisfaction. It could be the transformation of raw materials into parts that are subsequently assembled to create a final product.

Who is involved in the security system development life cycle who leads this process

The Software Development Live Cycle

These best practices are based in software and systems engineering with suggested activities; expectations for conduct of Systems Engineering Technical Reviews SETRs with entrance and exit criteria; Program Protection Planning PPP considerations; and specific application of SwA tools and methods during the DoD acquisition life cycle phases.

Exploitation of vulnerabilities in microelectronics and embedded software can cause mission failure in modern weapon systems…. Cyber supply chain vulnerabilities may be inserted or discovered throughout the life cycle of a system. Of particular concern are the weapons the nation depends upon today; almost all were developed, acquired, and fielded without formal protection plans.

The need for this focus is also reflected in National Defense Authorization Acts in recent years [3, 4, and 5] as well as in observations of programs by the Office of the Secretary of Defense OSDthe Military Services, and defense agencies e.

The JFAC is a federation of DoD organizations with a shared interest in promoting software and hardware assurance in defense acquisition programs, systems, and supporting activities.

Who is involved in the security system development life cycle who leads this process

The JFAC has sought to: This responsibility starts from the earliest exploratory phases of a program, with supporting technology maturation, through all phases of the acquisition. Technical risk management is a fundamental program management and engineering process that should be used to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities, defects, and weaknesses in SW and HW so they do not become breachable cyber vulnerabilities in deployed systems.

Cyber vulnerabilities provide potential exploitation points for adversaries to disrupt mission success by stealing, altering, or destroying system functionality, information, or technology.

SwA vulnerabilities and risk-based remediation strategies are assessed, planned for, and included in the PPP from a time frame early enough that resources can be planned and obtained. Based on the recent DoDI Where policy provides for the assessment of planning activities during development e.

Following are recommended SwA execution actions a PM can take during development, sustainment, and operation of weapon systems. These activities may be considered by DoD for inclusion in future policy and guidance.

The phases, from Materiel Solution Analysis to Operations and Support, contain multiple milestones, decision points and technical reviews.

The development and sustainment of software is a major portion of the total system life-cycle cost, and software assurance should be considered at every phase, milestone, decision point and technical review in the acquisition life cycle both to reduce cost and to repel cyberattacks.

A range of SwA activities must be planned and executed to gain assurance that any system containing software will perform operationally as expected, and only as expected. These activities blend into the entire life cycle, from requirements, to design, to implementation, to testing, to fielding, and to operation of the software.

Figure 1 shows the DoD acquisition life cycle, and the tables below describe activities that should be tailored and employed among the phases and technical reviews in its process.

Some of these assurance activities are also applied iteratively during the software development life cycle not shown whenever and wherever those software development activities occur during the DoD acquisition life cycle, such as in block, agile, or DevOps approaches.

Software Assurance spans the entire DoD Acquisition life cycle. Neglecting SwA in early life cycle activities such as development planning, requirements, architecture assessment, design, and code development will increase the cost of achieving assurance during later life cycle activities such as operational testing and sustainment.

But all life cycle phases require attention in the implementation of SwA. For example, thorough design and code review, use of static and origin analysis SwA tools, and follow-on remediation of findings, will both complement testing and reduce the resources expended during testing.

Some flaws are more readily found through SwA tools used during review and analysis, others through dynamic analysis in testing, and certain software vulnerabilities are only detectable through manual analysis. Also the costs and benefits of specific assurance activities e.

Table 1 through Table 5 identify SwA considerations and specific activities associated with each phase of the acquisition life cycle. If a program is initiated later in the life cycle, for example at Milestone B, select activities from earlier phases may still be appropriate for consideration in later phases as determined by assessment of the tactical or operational use of the system compared with mission threads and system requirements.

If a program is using an iterative development approach, SwA tools and methodology should be applied to individual software module development, then to integration testing and software builds so that vulnerabilities in software code are detected when they are generated, and remediated according to likelihood and consequence of adversarial attack.

It also provides tools-as-a-service for all DoD programs and organizations in support of the listed activities. Four examples are assurance service providers, access to subject matter expertise, the Assessment Knowledge Base, and SwA engineering tools. For the risk management process, develop understanding of how the deployed system may be attacked via software and use that understanding to scope criticality and threat analyses that are summarized in the PPP.

Plan assessments and map tactical use threads, mission threads, system requirements, system interoperability, and functionality upgrades from the existing deployed system, and maintain the mapping as metadata through the last upgrade in sustainment. Identify system requirements that may map to software and SwA requirements to facilitate trade-offs and studies to optimize functional architecture and system design, and planning and resourcing to mitigate software vulnerabilities, risks, and life cycle cost.

Consider alternatives to refine the system concept of implementation and optimize for modularity and digital engineering; ensure contract language for assurance reduces technical and programmatic risk.

Select secure design and coding standards for the program based on system functionality. Plan and resource for the use of automated tools that determine assurance for or that detect vulnerabilities, defects, and weaknesses in requirements, allocation of requirements to functional architecture, functional architecture, allocation of functions to system design, system design, allocation of design modules to software design, coding and unit testing, and integration testing.

Develop SwA activities interconnected across the system life cycle and document in the program software engineering planning document and in the program Integrated Master Schedule IMS. Architectures, designs, and code developed for prototyping are frequently reused later in development. Assess system functional requirements and verification methods for inclusion of SwA tools, methodologies, and remediation across the development life cycle.

Assess requirements for SwA are correct and complete regarding assurance. Consider means of attack such as insiders and adversaries using malicious inserts; system characteristics; interoperability with other systems; mission threads; and other factors.LANDSAT PROJECT GROUND SEGMENT.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP) Version System Development Life Cycle.. 4 Figure Phased Development for Larger Projects The Requirements Development process is a period spent repeating the Requirements Development loop shown in.

SSADM covers those aspects of the life-cycle of a system from the feasibility study stage to the production of a physical design; it is generally used in conjunction with other methods, such as PRINCE, which is concerned with the broader aspects of project management. Which members of an organization are involved in the security system development life cycle?

Who leads the process? How can the practice of information security . However, the increasing concerns and business risks associated with insecure software have brought increased attention to the need to integrate security into the development process.

Implementing a proper Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SSDLC) is important now more than ever. Demonstrates thorough understanding of information technology fundamental tools and concepts such as System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and applies that understanding to make independent practical contributions to work within the HRIS department.

Full Guide to Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and it's process and phases: Requirements gathering/analysis, design, coding, and testing The Software Development Life Cycle is a process that ensures good software is built. security processes and hardware and system requirements.

Let’s look in more detail at some .

The Life Cycle of a Use Case | The Software Development Live Cycle | InformIT